While others pound their chests proclaiming the top ten best horror movies of 2009, I thought I would take a different approach. Frankly, top ten lists are a dime a dozen these days. And why only ten? Who do we blame for limiting the best to only ten a year? I love reading these lists, though, but only when my favorites make the list (which I suspect is a habit we all share).
But what about all those regrettable horror movies you and I wasted time and money seeing in 2009? Now we’re talking. Not the worst movies or completely bad movies necessarily, but movies that are most regrettable because they zigged when they should have zagged, leaving me, and possibly you, with a sour taste in our mouths in spite of all the popcorn and soda eaten to make up for the disappointment. In a word, those movies that looked so promising but let us down.
I should say ‘let me down,’ since this is my most regrettable list for 2009. Maybe it will be yours, too.
1. The Collector
It came and went without collecting much of an audience. Torture porn horror hit its zenith in this slick nihilistic, but derivative, terrifying vision. In combining Cube-like lethal traps with a hint of Saw-styled ingenuity and malice, and yet another relentless masked-slasher victimizing a family in unsavory, bloodily grisly ways, Marcus Dunstan and Patrick Melton (Feast) do their darnedest to pulverize the audience with fears of helplessness, torture, and death. They almost succeed, but choose to go the usual horror franchise-building byway at the end with a negative payoff.
2. Friday the 13th
Jared Padalecki (Supernatural) is the only reason I saw this movie. I like him. I like him in this movie. I hate everything else. Remakes can be a dice game to begin with, but trying to remake and re-imagine an icon of horror means you gamble on what stays and what changes. In this case, the gamble didn’t pay off. What changed but shouldn’t have is the mystery and uncertainty about Jason. What should have changed but didn’t are the pick-a-number victims wearing “kill me, I’m stupid” signs on their butts.
3. The Haunting in Connecticut
A haunting without ghosts? How novel. While director Peter Cornwell and writers did manage to startle me twice, this movie has more in common with Tobe Hooper’s energetic spookfest Poltergeist than the lingering, atmospheric scares in Lewis Allen’s The Uninvited or Robert Wise’s The Haunting–but not enough in common to make it as good. A missed opportunity to create real fright instead of resorting to the usual special-effects and grisly spookshow makeup theatrics; less experienced horrorheads will enjoy it. Those with more experience, like me, will nitpick. Such is life.
4. The Last House On the Left
At least Ingmar Bergman put God squarely in the middle of his story, forcing guilt and shame on the parents who mete out vengeance to their daughter’s killers. You will not find emphasis on a divine presence in this latest incarnation of a story that really did not need to be retold. No guilt or shame, either. There is lots of ungodly loud, screeching music though, like bones dragged across a chalkboard. Unless you are entertained by the creative ways directors and writers emphasize these thematic elements, there is not much here for you. But if you are, you will especially enjoy the totally gratuitous ending involving a microwave and a deliberately paralyzed sadist. If you’ve seen Gremlins, you know what to expect.
5. Trick ‘r Treat
I regret this movie didn’t make it into the theaters. It should have.
I agree wholeheartedly with your first three, but I will admit, I actually liked the Last House remake better than Craven’s version.
No way B-sol! The original was much more gut wrenching while the remake pussy footed around.
I agree with the Haunting in C, this movie had so much potential and it really fell flat on it’s face. I mean come on, the mother is telling the story and she’s not there half the time! Way to go modern parenting…
I’m with B-sol on this one. I liked the remake better than the original. You cared about the characters more and it did a better job of building suspense.
The Collector on the other hand gave me a bad case of tourettes upon exiting the theater. The whole ending complete with set up for a franchise was completely presumptuous.
I’m with B too.
Haunting in C is what I like to call so close and yet so very VERY far away.
The Collector and F13 are just god friggen awful.
I swear if I see F13th on somebodys top 10 list…i am calling them out and making fun of them on my blog.
Hi John and Happy New Year
I have only seen Friday the 13th and Trick or Treat on this list. I actually liked the Jason flick but I did not go into expecting too much really. My wife, who is far from a slasher flick fan or horror fan period, even complained that the death scenes were too dark and the editing too jumpy. She said if she is going to sit through a film like this she wants be freaked out.
The Trick or Treat film is an odd one for me. Was it based on a comic book character? Not a huge fan of these newer films that tie in multiple vignettes at the end the way Crash and some other did. Sometimes cool but not in this one for me. I liked the creature though and wish more had been explained about him or it.
Bill
Thanks and a great new year for you, too. No, the character is not based on a comic. They just used the feel of EC for the anthology. I would love to see more anthology horror onscreen, actually. I liked the way the stories here were intertwined.